Political Chowder's NUMBER OF THE WEEK - Sponsored by www.no-deal.org



October 06, 2007

NUMBER OF THE WEEK
0 as in none
Source: The New Yorker September 24, 2007


The Bench
For the Love of Jury Duty

By Jeffrey Toobin|

The celebrities assembled last week by the Postal Service to launch a new stamp in honor of jury duty had one thing in common: none had ever served on a jury. "I've been down here, but I was never picked," Bernadette Peters said, as she waited for the ceremony to begin, in the rotunda of the New York County Courthouse building downtown. Ditto Cindy Adams, the Post gossip columnist. Paulina Porizkova, the model, recalled, "When I was called, I was pregnant, and I wasn't hormonally ready for a jury." The actor Richard Thomas is in the middle of a national run as Juror No. 8 in the stage version of "Twelve Angry Men." "According to the rules of show business, that entitles me to speak as an expert," he said.

The festivities were delayed for the arrival of Mariah Carey, who teetered into the courthouse on five-inch heels half an hour after the unveiling was to start. (Explaining her own failure to perform jury service, she said, "I was on tour.") At the ceremony, Carey said little. "It's so early," she began, before a microphone that had been affixed to her clingy black dress fell to the floor. "It's very important to do your part in this wonderful country where we live," she went on, before adding, again, "It's so early." (It was noon.)

Credit for the cheerfully off-kilter proceedings, as well as for the idea for the stamp itself, belonged mostly to Judith S. Kaye, the chief judge of the State of New York, who seemed to find no dissonance in the idea of civic exuberance over an act that many people find as worthy of commemoration as waiting for the cable guy. The occasion happened to take place on September 12th, the twenty-fourth anniversary of Kaye's début as a judge on New York's highest court, and through all those years the touchstone of her career has been an evangelical faith in the wisdom of juries.

Kaye, who was the force behind the change in New York law which abolished nearly all job-related exemptions from jury duty, speaks with the sort of exaggerated care that one might expect from an eminent judge, but she also has a mischievous smile that suggests a more street-smart sensibility. In conversation, she avoids the term "jury duty" and instead speaks of "jury service." "I see both the privilege and the burden of serving on a jury, but I put the accent on the positive," she said.

After the solemn procession of an honor guard and the singing of "God Bless America" by Daniel Rodriguez ("the singing policeman," who is now retired from the N.Y.P.D.), it was time for what Kaye called "the big moment." She tugged at a blue banner printed with the Postal Service logo and revealed the design of the new stamp. The forty-one-cent model features silhouettes of twelve faces in profile. The group reflects an unmistakable ethnic diversity, and one woman has unaccountably messy hair. "Jury Duty," the stamp reads. "Serve with Pride."

The celebrities left quickly after the ceremony ended, but Kaye invited some of the guests (including a group of high-school students) to lunch upstairs. Even after the usual long wait by the courthouse's elevators, she remained euphoric as she presided over buffet tables set up in a fourth-floor courtroom. "You know, they're only printing forty million of the stamps," she said. "That hardly seems enough."

READ MORE



www.no-deal.org
THIS WEEK'S NUMBER: 60 Million

Efficiencies...can they prove it????


Verizon (a large telecommunications behemoth) is aggressively pursuing the sale of its telephone land line business in NH, Maine and Vermont to a small rural communications outfit called FairPoint Communications. Every where you turn, experts from the investment arena, the utilities field, the labor community and the Public Utilities Commission are expressing concerns.

For example -the staff at the NH Public Utilities Commission is very skeptical about FairPoints promises of enormous savings :

FairPoint expects to gain over $60,000,000 per year in efficiencies when it has cut over to it's new systems. Verizon operates on a scale that totally dwarfs that of FairPoint by any reasonable measure, even after the acquisition ( of the landlines in NH, Maine and VT). For example, Northern NE represents only 3.6% of Verizon's access lines. This does not even consider Verizons huge operations in other businesses, such as wireless. FairPoints ability to gain efficiencies upon losing such economies of scale is very doubtful. At the least an assumption of synergies should be supported by clear convincing analysis, which FairPoint has not done.



There are many, many more issues that need to be examined. This is just a snippet of what's wrong with this deal. For more in depth details, please go on-line to www.no-deal.org. This is a bad deal for consumers, tax payers, rate payers, our communities and for the economic growth of New Hampshire.